COPE brings together all those involved in scholarly research and its publication to strengthen the network of support, education and debate in publication ethics
Since COPE and STM's research report on paper mills a year ago, there has been significant activity to take forward the recommendations made in the report. The activity is around collective action, investment in tools and technology, education and engagement, researcher incentives.
Our core 168飞艇开奖号码查询-官方开奖历史记录 | 幸运飞行艇开奖官网视频直播平台
Core practices are the policies and practices journals and publishers need, to reach the highest standards in publication ethics. We include cases with advice, guidance for day-to-day practice, education modules and events on topical issues, to support journals and publishers fulfil their policies.
Guidance & discussion
We are delighted to announce the launch of a series of practical flowcharts for journals and data repositories who are dealing with ethical concerns relating to data publication.
The authors of this guest editorial discuss cases where data sharing statements were not consistent with their expectations of data sharing in practice.
Three new cases with advice from the COPE Forum: balancing anonymisation and open science during peer review; protecting the safety of authors; conflicting views on the validity of a clinical protocol.
The COPE Forum began with a discussion on Best practices for guest edited collections. The discussion is open for comments on the website to COPE members and non-members.
Welcome to new COPE Council members: Daniel Ucko, Head of Ethics and Research Integrity at the American Physical Society; Mabel Chew, Senior Editor at the Lancet journal; Mike Streeter, Director of Research Integrity & Publishing Ethics at Wiley.
We are seeking applications to fill two vacancies on the Trustee Board as we look to expand the support we provide.
New guidance which discusses the ethical considerations of managing special issues while ensuring good and ethical publishing practices.
This discussion document presents practical considerations for managing scenarios where editors are contacted with ethical concerns about the integrity of published research.